Self-publishers have many hurdles to overcome along the way, but two of the biggest problems are getting the book up to professional writing standards, and attracting the attention of book bloggers. BookVetter is a new site which attempts to address both these issues.<\/p>\n
For the first, Bookvetter allows writers to post their finished books for review by other authors. Naturally, this isn’t a no-work affair; before you can see reviews of your own work, you have to review other people’s books on a one-for-one basis. Reading and reviewing entire first draft books in order to have your own book reviewed is very time-consuming, so it’s not going to be an option for everyone. If an author already has a tranche of beta readers lined up, then Bookvetter is not going to add much, if anything.<\/p>\n
However, for anyone who has no reliable source of beta readers, this might be a good alternative. I’m a big fan of online critique sites where authors comment on other author’s work on a chapter by chapter basis, and this could be the ideal extension of that, encompassing the whole book. You can start at the \u2018draft\u2019 level, requesting from one to five reviews. Then you can revise and resubmit, however, for each review you request, you have to review a book yourself, so it\u2019s not a process to be undertaken lightly.<\/p>\n
The second stage of the process is the ‘vetting’ part. Once your \u2018draft\u2019 reviews are positive, you can request \u2018published\u2019 reviews. If your book achieves six of this type of review saying it meets quality standards, it is declared as ‘vetted’ and then becomes available for book bloggers to read and review. The advantage of this for the blogger is a guaranteed source of free, quality material to review. For the author, it’s a potentially useful way to achieve blog reviews.<\/p>\n
The books are very finely categorised by genre, so you can choose to review some very specific sub-genres. Once you have your own work posted, you won’t be able to review anything in your own sub-genres, and there’s a very limited list of possible books for review (only three options at a time, currently). All reviews are posted anonymously, too. The system is designed to make it impossible for authors to get together into a tit-for-tat review group.<\/p>\n
There are a few questions in my mind about the effectiveness of the system. One is the timeliness of getting reviews: once you get to the beta reading stage, the sooner you get feedback the better, and having to wait months for reviews to trickle in might not be helpful. At the moment, the books offered for review are those which have been waiting longest, and as the site expands its membership, the time lag will improve.<\/p>\n
The other issue is the sort of book bloggers who might be attracted to the site. Any established blogger already has piles of free books waiting to be read, they’re very rarely going to be actively looking for new material, so this is more likely to attract new bloggers or authors who already have a review blog.<\/p>\n
Then there’s the question of money. Everything is free at the moment, but inevitably it will start charging eventually (the site owners have already ruled out advertising). Given the amount of time required to participate, users may resent also paying money to join.<\/p>\n
The aspect most likely to put users off is the amount of time it takes to complete the entire process. At the very least, it requires six reviews to make it through the system, and it could be many more. The process is complicated by separating reviews into \u2018draft\u2019 type or \u2018published\u2019 type, where only the \u2018published\u2019 type count for vetted status. Things would be far simpler if these were combined, and the only requirement is to achieve six positive reviews. However, there may be good reasons for this.<\/p>\n
At the moment the website is far from fully functional, and there are a few typos and technical glitches which don\u2019t inspire confidence. It remains to be seen how things improve over time, and whether the site scales up satisfactorily with increased user numbers.<\/p>\n
I confess I like the idea very much. As I’m not likely to be publishing more than a couple of books a year, at most, it won’t be a great deal of extra work for me to do the requisite reviewing so it might work out well. I don’t want to post ‘The Plains of Kallanash’ there as I’ve already got several beta readers for that, but when I start editing ‘The Fire Mages’, I might well post that for review.<\/p>\n
In the meantime, I’ll build up some credit by doing a few reviews. I\u2019ve already downloaded the first book. I had the option of epub or pdf format, but Calibre converted it to mobi for me. None of the books have DRM on them. Curiously, the book is one which is already published, the first part of a series, so I\u2019m not sure why the author is participating on Bookvetter at all. Another oddity: after downloading the first books, my three choices still include the two rejected choices, not a completely fresh selection. This makes the options very limited indeed.<\/p>\n
The review form has a few \u2018tick the box\u2019 options, covering formatting, grammar and typos, and the plot and reading experience generally. There are freeform sections to explain what you liked, what you disliked, and an overall review, each section to be at least 250 words. Then there\u2019s a question on publishability, and a few yes\/no questions specific to this book: such as, was there enough romance. Reviews have to be approved by the author concerned and by the site\u2019s management before they are accepted, and therefore count towards that book\u2019s quota. There\u2019s a nice touch to ensure reviewers really have read the book: the author posts three questions for the reviewer to answer on plot details.<\/p>\n
For anyone concerned about rights, Bookvetter is a private, password-protected site, and downloads are strictly controlled, so posting your book there doesn\u2019t affect your first publishing rights, and you retain copyright. All author-generated reviews become copyright of the site itself, but bloggers retain all rights to their reviews. I\u2019m going to give it a shot, and I’ll report back how things go.<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s a more detailed description of Bookvetter from Indies Unlimited<\/a>.<\/p>\n